----- Original Message -----From: Mike SchroederTo: Robert Powell ; Alan Couchman ; Arthur Clarke ; Chris Stevens ; Chuck Burnett ; Daniel New ; Dave Lescalleet ; David Lewis ; David Martinez ; Don BeBee ; Jeremiah Patoka ; John Bryant ; John Otis ; Mitch Friedman ; Nathan Shaver ; Pat Hastings ; Rick Mata ; Ron Avery ; Ryan Bebee ; Steve Phillips ; Terry BurnettSent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 7:06 AMSubject: RE: The Truth Of The GospelRobert,
Here is where I must disagree with Pastor Stam. As much as I respect Pastor Stam's ministry, this tract muddies the water by implying that Peter should have been preaching Paul's gospel.
Peter's first and second letters do not support this position. In 1 Peter 1, he makes it very clear that those Jews he was writing to, "the strangers scattered" (Ref. Acts 8) were not saved by grace. This is substantiated by the language of verses 5,9 and 13: You make a large error immediately upon interpreting who Peter was writing to:
"1 Peter 1:1-2 Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,
2 Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied."It is the strangers of the common wealth of Israel that Peter was talking to in these areas, not to Jews. He wrote to the same church that Paul had started in Galatia to back his message up. Paul also calls Gentiles strangers and aliens to the covenants and promises to Israel in Eph 2:12:"Ephesians 2:12 That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:"
I would have to deny reason and logic to conclude that Peter was speaking of some unique gospel only applicable to Jews upon reading the whole first chapter of 1st Peter. The first chapter of Peter is an exact duplicate of that which Paul was preaching.You argument is destroyed on the reading of 1 Peter 1 upon finding any one of the following from same:
- If we find that Peter was speaking to the Gentiles your argument is destroyed because you say he was speaking only to Jews.
- If Peter was speaking to the Jews your argument is destroyed because he told the Jews the same gospel message that Paul was telling the Gentiles and the Jews as well.
1 Pet 1:5,9,13
"....who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time....Receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls.....Wherefore gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and hope to the end for the grace that is to be brought unto you at the revelation of Jesus Christ"
This is not the gospel of the grace of God. First, the power that they are kept by, given to them (Ref. John 1:12) upon confessing (1 John 1:9), repenting, and being baptized (Acts 2:38), is the "gift of the Holy Ghost", "the anointing "(1 John 2:27) that enables them to be faithful unto the end (ref. Matt. 24:13). I now see what you are trying to do and how you are trying to cover yourself with a cloak. You are saying that the mere receiving if the "Holy Ghost" is the end of the "grace of God" which you say elsewhere is the "gospel of Christ" which you say you are a part of. This is error. And this error permits you to be unsaved, and unborn again because all you have learned that you need is the Holy Ghost or the Holy Spirit and this is all and the end of Christianity for Christians. This is as false as believing in Athena.
Briefly, salvation comes to them at the end of a faithfully lived life. Salvation comes to us (the body of Christ) at the beginning of our life of faith (Rom. 5:11)That statement is like saying the principles of electricity are of one type for Gentiles and they are of another type for Jews. This is non-sense. Jews better apply the same principles are they will be electricuted and the same goes for Gentiles. It is impossible for salvation to come to anyone in the beginning of their "life of faith" because faith is finished at our salvation. Therefore, the "life of faith" which leads to salvation by our surrender to the operation of God in Christ by our death, resurrection and ascension in the body of Christ which is also the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of Heaven end upon that experience. This is true for any body including the Jew and Gentile.
When Peter says, in Acts 15:11, "we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they," is he saying that they (the kingdom saints) are saved by grace through faith, as in Eph. 2:8? Hardly. They are saved by the blood atonement, just as the body of Christ is, but the blood is not applied at the same time. According to what Peter writes in those verses quoted above, for them it is clearly at the end, at the appearing of Jesus Christ. Romans 5:11 just as clearly says it is at the beginning for those in the body of Christ. They get the "power to become the sons of God," we get the seal of the Holy Spirit (Eph. 1:14), which bears witness with our spirit that we "are the children of God." (Romans 8:16). We are identified by our testimony (i.e., verbal confession-Romans 10:10; 1 Tim. 6:13) of salvation; they by the fruit they bear (Matt. 7:20)How can anyone arrive at your conclusions from reading the following?"Acts 15:4-20 And when they were come to Jerusalem, they were received of the church, and of the apostles and elders, and they declared all things that God had done with them.
5 But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed, saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the law of Moses.
6 And the apostles and elders came together for to consider of this matter.
7 And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto them, Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe.
8 And God, which knoweth the hearts, bare them witness, giving them the Holy Ghost, even as he did unto us;
9 And put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.
10 Now therefore why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?
11 But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they.
12 Then all the multitude kept silence, and gave audience to Barnabas and Paul, declaring what miracles and wonders God had wrought among the Gentiles by them.
13 And after they had held their peace, James answered, saying, Men and brethren, hearken unto me:
14 Simeon hath declared how God at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name.
15 And to this agree the words of the prophets; as it is written,
16 After this I will return, and will build again the tabernacle of David, which is fallen down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up:
17 That the residue of men might seek after the Lord, and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called, saith the Lord, who doeth all these things.
18 Known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world.
19 Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God:
20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood."
Peter in verse 7 above states that "God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe." This shoots all your doctrine down as Peter himself says God told him to preach to the Gentiles and that they should believe the same thing regarding the gospel of Christ. Where is your double gospel now?Peter says in verses 8-11 just the opposite of what you claim and those whom you follow that God bore witness giving the Gentiles the Holy Ghost the same as the Jew and put no difference between the Jew and the Gentile purifying their hearts by faith. He goes on to say, why tempt God to put a yoke upon the Gentiles that we or our fathers could keep. Then Peter said the direct opposite of what you conclude that the Jewish Christian church in Jerusalem believes they (the Jew) will be saved by the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ even as the Gentile. Where is your double gospel here? Why should we go on and on with your slaughter of the word which you call "rightly dividing?"My friend Mike, I know why you are doing this and why you are so persistent in your misreadings of the gospel. You have not been born again or saved and you know it and you are trying to avoid the need for it by constructing another gospel that does not require a rebirth. The receipt of the Holy Ghost is not rebirth. The receipt of the Holy Spirit is not salvation. The creation of the "gospel of Christ" as opposed to some kind of "gospel of the Kingdom" is not obtaining eternal life which you should really seek instead of spending hours and hours blocking up the entrance into the Kingdom of Heaven by creating false hyper distinctions which you and your cohorts call "rightly dividing the word." You and your friends have not rightly divided or deducted anything from scripture except an excuse for your failure to enter the Kingdom of Heaven and/or God by the death, resurrection and ascension of Christ. You have not trusted in the works of Christ nor his word and you do not know the scriptures nor the power of them. And unless you be born again you will never rightly divide the word of God or Christ.
Also, chapter 2, verse 9, which referes to them as a "royal priesthood, an holy nation," identifies them as the fulfillment of Exodus 19:6, and matches the "kings and priests" designation in Rev. 1:6; 5:10. Where does Paul ever refer to the body of Christ as a royal priesthood, or a nation?More dribble my good friend. I am in the royal priesthood and I am part of a holy nation and I am a King and a Priest made so by the death, resurrection and ascension of the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. And I see no point in trying to straighten any more of your deceptions out because you will simply make more. Because you are afraid to face the fact that you know in your heart. You must continue to create an excuse so that you can avoid the cross. But you cannot and will not. You will never be complete or fulfilled until you die on the cross with Christ and be resurrected with him and ascend with him. And the same goes for Terry Burnett.
Moreover, in his second letter to these folks, Peter tells them the things Paul writes of are "hard to by understood."(2 Pet. 3:16) If Paul's gospel is being preached by Peter, then why doesn't he, in his letters, simply explain it to them, and admonish them that this is now the gospel which they are to be following?Mike, Peter did that very thing but you cannot discern it. So the things Paul writes of are "hard to be understood" as you certainly missed it as well. Just because something is hard to understand does not mean there was a difference between what Peter was talking about and what Paul was talking about.Why is all this important anyway Mike? Do you really care how many gospels there are or who is supposed to have what? No! Your whole motive here is to avoid the salvation that is required via the cross. And you know this. You have already admitted in another email that you quit trying to be what you never will be. And I have found out what that is you have been striving for and never obtained. That is the born again experience which have not ever said you have experienced.
Finally, how is it that Peter, James and John can be members of the body of Christ, yet still inherit the kingdom of heaven, and sit on "twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel" (Matt. 19:28) in that earthly kingdom?Again Mike you will never put this all together properly until after you have been born again. You are trying to determine correct theology as one who has not experienced what Christ has provided for you and your solution is to theologically excuse yourself rather than continue to try and obtain the crown of life. Peter, James, John and Paul and I are members of the body of Christ and we have inherited the Kingdom of Heaven which is the cosmos and the first twelve apostles sit presently on twelve thrones over the house of Israel where as Paul is the great apostle to the Gentiles and I am a King and a Priest made so by the same operation of God in Christ.
Conclusion
I think the point of all this should be that, whatever happened during the Acts transition, at the end of it one gospel emerged, and that is Paul's gospel, "the gospel of the grace of God," which is now to be preached to "all nations for the obedience of faith." (Romans 16:26) It is absolutely not to be mixed with the other gospel, the "gospel of the kingdom," preached by Peter, James and John to the "circumcision," which paralleled it during the Acts. By doing this, as most of Christian theology does, you adulterate the grace gospel with works, which is clearly forbidden
Rom 11:6
6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.Mike, What has this doctrine got to do with all that above? Not a single thing. The Jews need to be saved by the operation of God in Christ or by the works of Christ which are his death, resurrection and ascension and so do the Gentiles. Works have no place with the Jews or the Gentiles.
Eph 2:8,9
For by grace are ye saved, through faith, and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God, Not of works, lest any man should boast. (KJV)
Again this has nothing to do with your argument! We are all saved by the same operation. We are saved by being in the body of Christ in his death, resurrection and ascension and we are lead to trust this operation by our faith that Christ did indeed do all of that and that we are in him when he did it. But our faith is finished when we experience the operation and go through the door he made into heaven by that operation and we then have the keys to the Kingdom and the gates of hell cannot prevail against them and those we save by this gospel are saved and those who ignore it, cover it up, reject it, do not trust it, cannot see it will be lost forever. The gateway to heaven and eternal life and salvation is on this side of the grave. Those that enter the grave prior to this experience are by definition lost.
Titus 3:5
5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost; (KJV)And you know not what this means either. The washing of regeneration is not the mere experience of the Holy Ghost or Spirit. The regeneration is when you are regenerated by the death resurrection and ascension of Christ. Otherwise you are unregenerated and in the old body with the unforgiven sins which only the cross removes. It is a washing in the blood of Christ and its effect is a renewing of the Holy Ghost which we sense on both sides of the cross. This Holy Ghost leads us to the Cross and takes us through the door of Christ to the eternal life in the Kingdom and renews our body to contain the new life we receive and the Holy Ghost is renewed in the process and is continually renewed afterward. This doctrine has nothing to do with what you claim.
MikeI say once again Mike, my friend, give these vain doctrines up for they do nothing for you or for anyone else. They do not lead to salvation but are a detour and an excuse to avoid what Christ has for you in him. Don't miss the big issue by striving so hard to perfect false doctrines. I pray that the Holy Ghost will lead you to the experience of eternal life and salvation and your entry into the Kingdom of Heaven upon Earth and throughout the galaxies via the death, resurrection and ascension of Christ Jesus prior to the grave.
No one can slaughter the scriptures as you and your cohorts have obviously done in the light for all to see unless you be blind yourself to what you are doing and why. I pray that you leave these false doctrines and seek regeneration now before it is too late.Sincerely,Ronald F. Avery
----- Original Message -----From: Robert PowellTo: Alan Couchman ; Arthur Clarke ; Chris Stevens ; Chuck Burnett ; Daniel New ; Dave Lescalleet ; David Lewis ; David Martinez ; Don BeBee ; Jeremiah Patoka ; John Bryant ; John Otis ; Mike Schroeder ; Mitch Friedman ; Nathan Shaver ; Pat Hastings ; Rick Mata ; Ron Avery ; Ryan Bebee ; Steve Phillips ; Terry BurnettSent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 9:04 PMSubject: The Truth Of The GospelTHE TRUTH OF THE GOSPEL
by Cornelius R. Stam
Twice in Galatians 2 Paul speaks of "the truth of the gospel." In both cases the Apostle had been forced to speak out to defend the purity of "the gospel of the grace of God."
In Verses 4,5 he refers to his contest with those at Jerusalem who would have brought the Gentile believers under the law of Moses. Among them were "false brethren," he says, "unawares brought in... to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage: to whom we gave place by subjection, no, not for an hour, that the truth of the gospel might continue with you."
In the second case he refers to a controversy with Peter who, having enjoyed blessed fellowship with Gentile Christians, had been intimidated by some of his Jewish brethren into separating himself from the Gentiles. Concerning this, Paul writes: "But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed" (Ver. 11). Why was Peter to be blamed? Verse 14 answers: Because he "walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel," i.e., "the gospel of the grace of God," in which believing Jews and Gentiles are "one body in Christ."
How we should all thank God for Paul's vigorous defense of the gospel of grace, under which all who trust in Christ as Savior are baptized by the Holy Spirit into the one true Bible Church (I Cor. 12:13).
Doubtless Paul's stand for "the gospel of the grace of God" stemmed from the fact that he himself had experienced the truth of this blessed message. As the chief of sinners he had been gloriously saved. All his power and prestige as a Pharisee, all his intellectual achievement, all his rigid Law observance meant nothing now, as in the presence of the glorified Lord he saw himself a sinner, the chief of sinners, and was saved by the matchless grace of God.
"
----- Original Message -----From: Mike SchroederCc: Alan Couchman ; Arthur Clarke ; Chris Stevens ; David Lewis ; David Martinez ; Jeremiah Patoka ; John Bryant ; John Otis ; Mitch Friedman ; Nathan Shaver ; Pat Hastings ; Rick Mata ; Steve Phillips ; Terry Burnett ; JimBob Howard ; Dakota TremayneSent: Monday, August 04, 2008 7:49 AMSubject: RE: On Miles Coverdale and rightly dividingRon Avery wrote:
Really, Mike, come on! Please! You have said nothing in that paragraph about anything other than your denial that you think I live in the Kingdom of Heaven. You can't know that I'm not living in the Kingdom of Heaven and you can't prove me wrong with any scripture. But I can prove I do live in the Kingdom of Heaven by scripture. But you want me to lie about my state of being and adopt a lesser doctrine and use words that appear to have no meaning at all to you. You use great passages but don't know what they mean!
Your "much speaking" (Matt. 6:7) response proves my earlier point about you (and Alan) having an aversion to the use of scripture to prove your points. After declaring that you will prove your proposition by scripture you proceed to write one of your characteristic, long, rambling, incoherent "explanations" of what you believe, and provide not one reference to scripture!
Here's your error, in a nutshell: The kingdom of heaven is a distinct, earthly entity referred to 32 times in the book of Matthew, as the sole inheritance of the 12 disciples (Matt. 19:28) and the lost sheep of the house of Israel (Matt. 15:24). Yes, it is a part of the overall kingdom of God, like a mountain is part of the earth, but it isn't "the" kingdom itself. Yes, I and you, Ron, if we are saved, as members of the body of Christ, are part of the spiritual kingdom (Col. 1:13), but we aren't a part of, or in the K of H.
The problem with your contention is that you make no distinction--do not rightly divide-- between the two.
Mike
From: taphouse@sbcglobal.net
To: schroeder456@hotmail.com
CC: taphouse@sbcglobal.net; acouchman@cptexas.org; afctexas@gmail.com; chris_stevens@dell.com; drdavidlewis@grandecom.net; dmzcsa@yahoo.com; jpatoka.spam@gmail.com; preach2me@sbcglobal.net; cjotis2@yahoo.com; mitch@journeybf.com; nwshaver@gmail.com; path@boldmark.com; enriquemataiii@hotmail.com; guitarman910@yahoo.com; tlburnett@cctex.com; jimbobhoward@gmail.com; dante.hsc@gmail.com
Subject: Re: On Miles Coverdale and rightly dividing
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 23:24:39 -0500
Dear Mike,My reply is in red below:----- Original Message -----From: Mike SchroederSent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 5:45 AMSubject: RE: On Miles Coverdale and rightly dividing
Ron,
You wrote:
I wrote the following or something like the following to Robert. As a "rightly divider" make sure you understand and quote others along with who it is written to as that will change the entire meaning of what was said. Just kidding! Do you believe the following changed because I said it to Robert and not you?
I appreciate your candid reply. Let us pretend for just a moment what would happen if everyone on earth was born again into the kingdom of Heaven on Earth by their death, resurrection and ascension with Christ to sit down with him in Heaven (Eph. 2:6). What would we then have? Would we all still be trying to study the word and tell our neighbors what we learned from the word today so we could rightly divide the word? I think not. I believe that the first and primary reason for "rightly dividing the word" is so that we enter the Kingdom of God and secondly it is to get others into the Kingdom of God. I do not believe there is any other reason. I do not believe there is a scholastic reason to find any other kind of information or any other kind of purpose such as gaining wealth, finding true happiness or wisdom for those things come with entry into the Kingdom of God or Heaven by the operation of Christ's death resurrection and ascension.If we were presently in the kingdom of heaven on earth your assertion would be true. No one--those "born of God" (1 John 3:9; 4:7; 5:18)--would need to study Scripture, because what they would need to know would be supernaturally written on their hearts and in their minds. (Jer. 31;33; Heb. 8:8:10; 10:16). There will be no need for teaching in the K of H (1 John 2:20,27).It's not "if we were presently in the Kingdom of Heaven on earth" it is that I am in the Kingdom of Heaven by my testimony and you are not in the Kingdom of God by your own admission. Therefore by definition you are not "rightly dividing the word" properly. If you were "rightly dividing the word" you too would be in the Kingdom of Heaven right now. If you were "born again" you would see and be in the Kingdom of God or Heaven on Earth and you would be sitting in the Heavenly Places in Christ Jesus. But you are not by your own admission. Therefore, again you have been deceived and the Kingdom of Heaven has been closed to you by your own theology. At this point you will have to remain un born or change your theology. It appears that you had rather remain un regenerated. The future consequences are not very good.
The problem with this proposition is we aren't in the Kingdom of Heaven, Ron, we're in the dispensation of the grace of God (Eph. 3:2), which was given to Paul, exclusively, to give to us ("you Gentiles") "for the obedience of faith" (Romans 16:26). When Paul commands Timothy (and us) to "rightly divide the word of truth" (2 Tim. 2:15) he, first, means to distinguish between doctrine for the New Testament (the K of H) and the D of G, which means, in no uncertain terms, DON'T MIX THEM!Really, Mike, come on! Please! You have said nothing in that paragraph about anything other than your denial that you think I live in the Kingdom of Heaven. You can't know that I'm not living in the Kingdom of Heaven and you can't prove me wrong with any scripture. But I can prove I do live in the Kingdom of Heaven by scripture. But you want me to lie about my state of being and adopt a lesser doctrine and use words that appear to have no meaning at all to you. You use great passages but don't know what they mean!I know I live in the "dispensation of the grace of God" which is the Kingdom of Heaven which was established by the death resurrection and ascension of Christ of which I have benefited from in that I was with him in those acts as all other things in space and time. I have appropriated it for my benefit and you have not by admission. I could not have participated in those events without "the obedience of faith." Faith led me to trust in Christ. And after years of trust and seeking and knocking and asking, one day it was opened and I went in. One cannot enter the Kingdom of Heaven unless one "rightly divides the word" of God. One cannot enter the Kingdom of God or Heaven by perverting the scriptures. The point of perversion is to make an excuse for not being born again or diminishing the need or claiming it belongs to someone else. The purpose of "rightly dividing the word" is so that all mankind is saved by the operation of God in Christ. You can not point to scripture that defines "rightly dividing the word of truth" as distinguishing between a New Testament doctrine of the "Kingdom of Heaven" for Jews versus a New Testament doctrine of "Dispensation of God" for Gentiles. The "Kingdom of Heaven" is a place (everywhere) and the "Dispensation of Grace" is how you get there. It is obvious why this dichotomy has been contrived by the deceivers. Those who have been studying the New Testament but have not been "born again" as required to see the Kingdom of God, have excused themselves by claiming it is only meant for Jews. You have said in earlier emails that you have been relieved by your new doctrine. I believe that relief you feel is because you once sought after being "born again" but could not get that experience so in your frustration you joined this cult of other "Christians" that deny the need for that experience and claim that experience is for Jews only. That is heresy and I am proof of it as I was born again and I am in the Kingdom of God and Heaven and I am not a Jew by blood but by circumcision of the Heart or the death resurrection and ascension of Christ. And what has happened to me has happened the whole cosmos. But you don't perceive that, revealing to me that you are in denial of the power of Christ to save anyone by his death resurrection and ascension. For no man is saved short of the experience of that act. For there is simply no need for the death resurrection and ascension of Christ if men are saved by merely believing on him or his name or that he did those things. One must place themselves where Christ went and where he is now.Now the "Dispensation of God" is no other thing then the power of God in Christ to save men by his death resurrection and ascension. And this dispensation is the open door of the death resurrection and ascension of Christ which no man can close (which you are trying to do the very best you can by perverting the scriptures) and this door or dispensation of God will remain open until Christ returns to close it at judgment at which time no man will open.I was never as confident as you before I was born again and I recommend that you return to your asking and seeking and knocking until the door is opened to you and I recommend that you go through the door and sit down in Heaven with Christ and leave all this outcome based slaughter of the word passed off as "rightly dividing." What would you have done if the author had said "rightly deduct or deduce the word of God." I guess you would be taking things out of the word. But "rightly divide" in this context means "rightly discern." So rather than divide the word up into arbitrary blocks to achieve excuses for failure why not discern the meaning and purpose of all scripture is to save you and your friends. For you will not be saved by your theology. I am saved by my theology. So if you ask me which theology I prefer and which I will profess and recommend to others, it will be my theology.When you can come on this forum and state honestly that you have been born again into the Kingdom of Heaven and God to sit down in the Heavenly places with Christ Jesus, I will listen to what you have to say about any other doctrine in the Bible. But until then you are a novice for these issues are basic not advanced. And what I say here for you I say here for all those on this forum and for all Jews and for everyone else in space and time.But unfortunately, I believe that your theology is a defensive mechanism rather than a delivery mechanism and that you are so encrusted with this theology and so used to throwing it around you rather than seeking all that God has for you that you will continue in your error. It must scare you to leave your turtle shell theology and once again seek the Kingdom God in fear that you will not find it on your next journey out.
MikeI really do now pray for you Mike, for I also know you and I know Phil and Dave and a few others in your theology and none of these men have ever confessed to me of a "born again" experience and this is simply not a good thing. I don't want to hurt with the word or in any other way. But I had rather hurt you than lose you. I too want all men saved and I reject doctrines that do not lead to regeneration in Christ into the Kingdom of Heaven where I am now. I want you to join me there and all others that they might know the height, depth, and breath of the Love of God in Christ.Why don't we all pray right now: Jesus Christ in Heaven, if Ron is really right and not deceiving us, please show me how he can say such things. I want to be in the Kingdom of God with you right now. I am tired of theology and much thinking and much learning. I want to know something more than I know my own name. I want to be weightless. I want to fill the cosmos. I want the cosmos to be in me. I want to be in you as you said I was. I want you to be in me as you said you were. I want to be with you while walking on the water. I want to be with you in your crucifixion. I want to die with you on the cross. I want to be buried with you in the tomb. I want to come out of the tomb with you and be with you for 40 days visiting your friends and disciples. I want to ascend with you into heaven in front of 500 witnesses. I know that for me to be with you, as you said, I must be with you everywhere you were and are now. Jesus, I believe you are in Heaven right now and I believe what you said when you prayed to your Father in Heaven for me to be with you where you are that I may behold your glory. I want what Ron says he has even if he doesn't have it himself. Ron is no better than I am and if he could obtain it now, I want it too! I believe you and I confess that I believe that I am in you in all that you ever did or ever will do including sitting down in the Kingdom of Heaven and coming again in judgment. I do not want to be found outside you upon your return. I don't want to be in the church but not in your body which hung on the cross. I do not want to spend another hour trudging through theology and spend days and months and years using arguments in defense of where I am if I am not with you in the Kingdom of Heaven right now. I believe that you have saved every human being by your death resurrection and ascension and I pray that I am able to perceive of why that is so and that I may be found in you upon your return, for I do not want to be destroyed by the brightness of your coming. And Jesus I don't want a lesser theology that leaves me out of something or some blessing. I want all you have for me. I want to be where you are right now in the Kingdom of Heaven. Please let me be everywhere you have been and everywhere you are and everywhere you are going. Amen
Sincerely,Ron Avery
From: taphouse@sbcglobal.net
To: taphouse@sbcglobal.net
CC: ronpaul-1529@meetup.com
Subject: Resend email to Ron Avery
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:25:44 -0500Friends,If you have sent me email in the last two days please send it to me again as I went to my yahoo mail on another computer and I messed up and deleted my email where I could not download it. If you send it again I will get it as I am back on my old computer.Sincerely,Ron
Your PC, mobile phone, and online services work together like never before. See how Windows® fits your life
Get Windows Live and get whatever you need, wherever you are. Start here.